Winston-Salem Journal
Subscribe!
|
 
NewsNews

Legislative bill on abortion would be government intrusion into painful, private decision

»  Comments | Post a Comment

We do not question the good intentions of conservative state lawmakers pushing a bill to require those seeking an abortion to wait 24 hours and view an ultrasound of the fetus, but such restrictions are an invasion of privacy and a form of intimidation meant to chip away at a woman's legal right to abortion.

They also represent a blatant form of government intrusion into the private lives of citizens, particularly the confidential relationship between a patient and her doctor. And they assume a basic ignorance and a casual indifference by women who make the heart-wrenching decision to have an abortion. We believe most women are quite well aware of the nature and gravity of the issue.

The Woman's Right to Know Act, sponsored by Rep. Ruth Samuelson, R-Mecklenburg, and Pat McElraft, R-Carteret, would require women, in addition to the waiting period, to have an ultrasound view of their fetuses at least four hours before an abortion, and require a provider to describe what they are seeing. It would require the woman to sign a document acknowledging that the image was described to her by a provider. House Speaker Pro Tem Dale Folwell, R-Forsyth, is among a large number of co-sponsors of the bill.

North Carolina is one of 16 states that don't require counseling before an abortion. Half of the states require women to wait between counseling and the procedure, and 10 states require a pre-abortion ultrasound, The Associated Press reported. Supporters of the bill say the requirements would give women a more complete picture of what's at stake, including how far along the fetus has progressed.

"Basically, this bill is just bad medicine and bad policy," Melissa Reed, vice president for public policy for Planned Parenthood Health Systems in North Carolina, told The Asheville Citizen-Times. "It's an outrageous intrusion into the sacred doctor-patient relationship."

Other critics said the bill will add costs and increase the number of unplanned births.

We understand the emotional reaction to abortion that compels conservatives to grant an exception to their usual aversion to government interference in people's lives. And like most people on both sides of the issue, we wish abortion did not have to be a choice for anyone. But the reality is different. And the fact remains that abortion is legal in the United States.

Decisions about abortion are not easy. The fundamental issue is who gets to make those decisions. The Supreme Court 38 years ago said, in effect, that it should be a matter for a woman and her conscience. We have long agreed, and we would add that it should be unfettered by a heavy-handed government intent on heaping guilt upon those who have the right and the intelligence to make such an intensely personal decision for themselves.

Terms and Conditions

Advertisement

 
 

Advertisement

Reader Comments

*Facebook Account Required to Comment. If you are not already logged into Facebook, please click the comment button to do so.

Deal of the Day

Advertisement

 

More Ways to Connect

Advertisement

Breaking News Email Alerts

Breaking News Email Alerts

Get breaking news sent straight to your inbox!

 

Most Popular

ViewedNews
  • 1.Judge shuts down trial after jurors dress alike, one flirts with Edwards
  • 2.Evolution doubts criticized
  • 3.High Point struggles to cover revenue gap
  • 4.Man jailed in 1979 death of missing boy
  • 5.Final voyage: USS Iowa on way to final home

News and Features Galleries

Advertisement

Media General
KewlBoxBoxerJam: Games & Puzzles
Games, Puzzles & Trivia
Blockdot: Advergaming and Branded Media
Advergaming and Branded Media

MyYahoo!