Winston-Salem Journal
Subscribe!
|
 
NewsNews

Stopping online venom

»  Comments | Post a Comment

In May 2007, the ombudsman for The Washington Post wrote about a fairly new online feature that allowed readers to comment instantly on stories and columns.

Under the headline "Online Venom or Vibrant Speech?" Deborah Howell said that in the old days, readers who wanted to complain had to write signed, civil letters to the editor. Online comments are immediate, allow the writers to be virtually anonymous "and can be raw, racist, sexist and revolting," she wrote.

The harsh tone of the online feedback had surprised reporters and some readers, who wanted the Post to police the site and remove rude and incendiary remarks.

"Two important journalism values -- free, unfettered comment and civil, intelligent discourse -- are colliding. My two cents: Monitor the comments much more vigorously and use the old journalism rule: When in doubt, take it out," Howell wrote.

In 2010, when every Web site encourages instant comment, these words resonate with sad irony. On Jan. 2, Deborah Howell, a trailblazer and inspiration to many reporters and editors, died in a tragic car accident while on vacation in New Zealand with her husband.

I knew and admired Deborah, who had led newsrooms in the Twin Cities to Pulitzer Prizes and had been Washington bureau chief of Newhouse News Service before becoming the Post's reader representative. She was a journalist's journalist -- tough, fair, caring, funny, hard-charging. Retired, she was on a trip of a lifetime, and her sudden death was a shock.

I was astonished and sickened to learn that online stories and columns about her death had prompted a storm of reader comments so foul that various news sites, including the Post's, had to shut down comments.

Melinda Henneberger, the editor of Politics Daily, said that while some writers praised Howell, some typed comments of the "woo-hoo, you're dead!" variety. Henneberger wrote on politicsdaily.com:

"There was also a shocking number of comments to the effect that since Howell was in the news business, she must have been a lefty, so how fabulous she'd been killed.

"There was joshing speculation about whether she'd been driving a hybrid, a joke about how liberals walking in lockstep really ought to be more careful, and a couple of cracks about how Republicans were sure to be blamed. ‘One less of those anti-US types to deal with,' said one of several celebratory rejoinders from readers who by their own account had five minutes earlier never even heard of Deborah Howell."

It's worth underlining that not everyone responded so cruelly.

Still, when deceased strangers become fodder for partisan vitriol, we're all in trouble. Nor are such cheap shots limited to perceived liberals. A Politics Daily obit on Irving Kristol also brought out mean-spirited remarks, Henneberger wrote.

My own quick survey found that at least one news site did allow particularly offensive comments about Howell to stand, and other readers blasted the writers in no uncertain terms.

I support "vibrant speech" online as Deborah Howell did, and I recognize that a certain amount of venom may be inevitable. We're still struggling with how much is too much.

All too often the Internet rewards the coarsest among us. We like to think the Web makes us all publishers. In reality, it empowers most people to whisper into the wind. When it comes to political discourse, the harshest and most strident voices succeed in gaining huge audiences, lucrative book contracts and TV appearances.

Being reasonable tends not to be a smart career move online. It's smarter to be rude and razor-tongued.

For those on the right, it's expedient to accuse the president of being immoral, evil, socialist or fascist rather than to disagree with his policies and offer constructive alternatives. Those on the left win by accusing their Republican opponents of being heartless, uncaring tools of business.

One wonders how Deborah Howell would have reacted to this week's venomous online attacks. Friends say the comments would have hurt her, of course, but the fierce journalist would not have wanted them pulled. I'm sorry the question even arises.

Marsha Mercer is an independent columnist writing from Washington. She can be reached at marsha.mercer@yahoo.com.

Terms and Conditions

Advertisement

 
 

Advertisement

Reader Comments

*Facebook Account Required to Comment. If you are not already logged into Facebook, please click the comment button to do so.

Deal of the Day

Advertisement

 

More Ways to Connect

Advertisement

Breaking News Email Alerts

Breaking News Email Alerts

Get breaking news sent straight to your inbox!

 

Most Popular

ViewedNews

News and Features Galleries

Advertisement

Media General
KewlBoxBoxerJam: Games & Puzzles
Games, Puzzles & Trivia
Blockdot: Advergaming and Branded Media
Advergaming and Branded Media

MyYahoo!