Could this turn into something more than political theater?
President Obama's televised dialogue with GOP legislators on health care later this month has the makings of an entertaining exchange. But the differences between the basic Democratic and GOP ideas are stark -- and the two sides have increasingly hardened their positions in this election year.
Yet, in a story with more twists than a soap opera, Obama's invitation to congressional leaders of both parties to attend a Feb. 25 meeting can't be dismissed as a mere diversion. Although many Americans have doubts about the Democrats' sweeping plans to cover the uninsured, Republicans can't afford to be perceived as oblivious to the health-care of middle-class families.
"My expectations? Probably below 50 percent, but not zero," said Rep. Gerry Connolly, D-Va., a moderate who serves as president of the Democratic freshman class in the House. "At some point, the public is going to demand that Republicans participate like mature adults, and not just say ‘no' to everything."
The Democrats' approach -- not the Republicans -- is the problem, said Rep. Dave Camp, R-Mich., the author of the House GOP bill. "The president has got to show that he has heard what the American people are saying. He's got to make clear we are not going to start off with the current bill."
But where to start?
Democrats want an upfront commitment to cover most of the nearly 50 million uninsured Americans. Republicans prefer to cut costs, then revisit full coverage over time.
Democrats would raise taxes to provide government subsidies for people who can't afford to buy health insurance. Republicans say now is not the time to increase taxes.
Both sides want to bar insurance companies from turning down people with health problems, but only Democrats propose requiring most people to get coverage.
To illustrate the gap between the two sides, the House GOP bill would cover 3 million uninsured people, the House Democratic version 36 million.
"That's quite a gulf," said Rep. Steny Hoyer, D-Md., the No. 2 Democrat in the House. "And if that's where Republicans want to stay, I don't think it's going to be perceived as much progress by the 33 million who would be left out."
After months of seeing Obama try to muscle the legislation through with only Democratic votes, Republicans are a little wary of his new overture. The election of Republican Scott Brown in Massachusetts changed the balance of power in the Senate.
"This has the feel of a campaign event," said economist Douglas Holtz-Eakin, a top adviser to 2008 GOP presidential candidate John McCain. "The time to sit down with Republicans was a year ago."
The House and Senate are partisan institutions by design, Holtz-Eakin said. Divided into majority and minority, they sharpen differences. Only Obama could have guaranteed a bipartisan health-care bill. "You needed the White House to spend political capital telling the liberal base in the House they weren't going to get everything they wanted," he said. "They weren't able to do that."
Email
Facebook
Google
Twitter
Favorites
More
Advertisement