I doubt that much sleep was lost when the tiny Episcopal Diocese of Quincy, Ill., recently voted to secede from the national Episcopal Church for being too liberal.
With 1,800 members scattered over a large area bordering the Mississippi River, the diocese has long been a recalcitrant outpost of the fading Anglo-Catholic wing of the Episcopal Church. Its stern refusals -- No to women as priests, No to homosexuals, No to theological diversity -- have played poorly in Peoria.
Its 24 congregations have an average membership of 75, far below the 400 needed for economic viability, and far below, for example, the Diocese of Connecticut's 368 members per congregation. At perhaps 0.2 percent, its local market share is well below the 1 percent that Episcopal congregations normally achieve. Its 7 percent decline in membership since 2006 is the worst among Episcopal dioceses in its region.
Even so, Quincy's debate over leaving the national denomination was illuminating.
Detachment from reality
With the nation caught up in its worst financial crisis since the Great Depression, focusing a church convention on denominational politics showed an odd detachment from reality. Unemployment is up about 30 percent in Peoria. Housing starts are down by half from a year ago. Governments in Illinois are slashing services. With Detroit imploding and farmers struggling, people are watching Caterpillar Corp., the area's major employer, not a fringe church's opinions on sexuality.
Quincy's debate shows an odd detachment from the Gospel, too. The debate's final speaker is quoted as saying: "We need to make a choice. Is Jesus Christ our Savior or not?" Another said, "We feel the Episcopal Church has been on a fast, major drift away from scriptural authority and historic Christian teaching."
Jesus, of course, said nothing about homosexuality, ordination rules or church structures. An estimated two-thirds of his teachings concerned wealth and property and our need to be more generous and sacrificial.
Time for introspection?
If a church wanted to walk the walk of Jesus as Savior, it wouldn't be debating sexuality. It would be helping people to deal with economic deprivation and to correct the values that led to this morass. It would promote community and sacrifice.
A church that truly accepted the authority of Scripture would know that God "hates and despises your festivals" and condemns those who live "at ease" and exploit others. It would know that the more ancient Israel became effete and self-focused, the more God welcomed invading Assyrians and Chaldeans.
A church truly concerned about "historic Christian teaching" would look at Christian history -- the gap between Jesus' circles of inclusion and the early Church's hierarchy and exclusion; the gap between Jesus' call for peace and Church-sponsored wars; the gap between Jesus' humility and prelates' pride -- and conclude that, yes, perhaps it's time to take a fresh look at what they claim and what they are.
Email
Facebook
Google
Twitter
Favorites
More
Advertisement