A group of scientists, joined by a member of Congress, used the 100th anniversary of the Tunguska asteroid last week to draw attention to their belief that the United States is not doing enough to defend the planet against the dangers posed by near-Earth objects.
"We are not prepared at this time to prevent the massive death and destruction that would occur if an object from space hit the Earth as it did in Tunguska," said Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, R-Calif., at a news conference at the Pasadena, Calif., offices of the Planetary Society.
If an asteroid the size of the one believed to have exploded in the air above Tunguska, in Siberia, were to explode over Los Angeles, he said, the destruction would range over much of Southern California.
Although no one is sure what caused the Tunguska explosion, which flattened trees over an 800-square-mile area on June 30, 1908, most scientists believe that an asteroid about 150 feet across exploded in the air above the remote river valley in eastern Russia. No one was killed.
The National Aeronautics and Space Administration has established a Near-Earth Object Program Office at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena to monitor potentially dangerous asteroids. The most scrutinized is Apophis, which has about a 1-in-45,000 chance of hitting Earth in 2036, according to Don Yeomans, the manager of the Near-Earth Object Program Office. Apophis is about five times the suspected size of the Tunguska object.
But Alan Harris, a senior research scientist at the Space Science Institute in Boulder, Colo., said that the greatest danger does not come from the objects we know about but from the ones we haven't identified.
In one example of the lack of attention the issue is receiving in Washington, Rohrabacher said, financing for the Arecibo, Puerto Rico, radio telescope, which searches for near-Earth objects, is in danger in next year's budget.
Email
Facebook
Google
Twitter
Favorites
More
Advertisement