Winston Salem Journal

National/International

Print This Print AddThis Social Bookmark Button

States try to rein in debt collectors

N.C. law requires companies to prove they're owed

ADVERTISEMENT

Published: October 18, 2009

With many Americans in dire financial straits, states are cracking down to make sure that aggressive debt collectors target only people who legitimately owe them money.

National consumer-credit laws already prohibit collection agencies from harassment, deceptive, or unfair practices such as telling neighbors or family about what is owed, or calling before 8 a.m. or late at night. Since the recession started, at least six states have adopted additional limits, such as imposing statutes of limitation on collections and adding opportunities to punish abusive practices in court. Other states may follow suit.

Legislators are increasingly focusing on companies that buy bad debt from credit-card companies and other lenders for pennies on the dollar and profit when they collect more than they paid.

Debtors -- some agree they owe money, others say they've already paid or are disputing their bills -- have reported being bombarded with calls and subjected to foul language and threats of arrest or deportation.

A North Carolina law that took effect this month requires debt buyers filing collection lawsuits to produce documents proving that they're the ones owed the money. Trying to collect on a debt that a company should reasonably know is invalid could lead to lawsuits and civil penalties of up to $4,000 a violation.

N.C. Attorney General Roy Cooper cites the case of a 65-year-old woman who had been plagued by up to five collection calls a day until her attorney demanded proof that she owed the money. They learned that collectors were looking for a debtor in Greensboro, about 140 miles to the west.

"We've gotten a lot of cases that the debt is not owed or the debt has been paid off," Cooper said. "They call, and they browbeat people to pay money that they don't even owe."

Other states including Idaho, Colorado, New York, Arkansas and Maryland, along with New York City, have also recently passed more explicit rules for debt collectors. Legislators in several more -- including Massachusetts and New Jersey -- have pushed bills that could come up again in next year's legislative sessions.

North Carolina's law came too late to help Eleanor Chittum, 63, who now lives in a Winston-Salem convalescent home. Her records showed that she owed $1,439 to Direct Merchants Credit Card Bank on a Visa card, but paid off that account by transferring it to another card. She was stunned when a collection company contacted her to say she owed $1,800.

"Then they sent me a bill for that amount, and I said: ‘Why do I owe that? I paid it off,'" Chittum said. "I was shocked to see this bill come in like that."

A North Carolina company called Brock and Scott Holdings Inc. filed a lawsuit in late 2007 saying that Chittum owed them the original amount plus interest. The company's attorney said that it wasn't required to prove from the outset that Chittum owed the debt, just that its records were kept properly. Under the new state law, it would have had to document that she owed the money.

"If she owes the debt, she'll pay it. We've tried for a year and a half to get them to prove that she owes the debt," Charles F. Hall IV, a Legal Aid attorney representing Chittum, said.

Neither Brock and Scott Holding executives nor an attorney pursuing Chittum's debt responded to requests for comment.

"The bottom line: people should pay their debts," Cooper said. "But what this legislation does is make the debt buyer produce proof that the debt is actually owed."

A New York City ordinance passed last spring requires similar proof from debt collectors, forcing them to tell consumers what company they represent, the original creditor, and the amount of the debt they owe.

"Anyone contacted by a debt-collection agency will now be empowered to demand written documentation regarding the status and history of the debt," Mayor Michael Bloomberg said.

Debt buyers say it's unfair to limit their right to force people to pay their bills.

Loading Comments...
Loading
Print This Print AddThis Social Bookmark Button
 

ADVERTISEMENT

id="companion_ad"

Advertisement

Oops! Your email could not be sent because of the following errors: