Winston Salem Journal

News

Print This Print AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Smoking-ban supporters try to restore bill's restrictions

ADVERTISEMENT

Related Articles

May 14, 2009
BANNED: Supporters mostly pleased with bill, but opponents say it violates rights

May 12, 2009
N.C. Senate approves smoking ban

May 8, 2009
Senate votes for smoking ban

May 7, 2009
Smoking ban diluted

May 1, 2009
Democrats delay smoking-ban bill to firm up votes

April 30, 2009
Smoking bill up for vote

April 23, 2009
Smoking-ban supporters try to restore bill's restrictions

April 5, 2009
Smoking bill unfair, some say

April 3, 2009
Smoking ban faces steeper hill in Senate

April 2, 2009
Making It Tough to Puff: N.C. House dilutes proposed ban on smoking, allowing some bars, restaurants to make choice

April 1, 2009
Vote on smoking ban may end an era in a tobacco state

March 25, 2009
Smoking ban goes to House

March 19, 2009
The Rising Cost of A Smoke: Perdue's proposed $1 tax on cigarettes and the 62-cent U.S. levy have smokers feeling overtaxed

March 18, 2009
Regional Briefs: Anti-smoking bill would let tougher local rules prevail

March 4, 2009
Regional Briefs: Bill banning public smoking clears panel

February 27, 2009
N.C. legislators have first hearing on restricting smoking

February 5, 2009
Ban on workplace smoking endorsed

January 30, 2009
Area legislators' bills deal with smoking, forced sterilization

July 2, 2008
Committee passes ban on smoking in vehicles

June 11, 2008
Committee approves smoking bans on government property

January 1, 2008
Immigration, smoking and loans among issues

Published: April 23, 2009

RALEIGH

Supporters of a ban on smoking in indoor workplaces in North Carolina are trying to restore a provision that would include adult-only businesses under the ban.

The smoking ban was approved by the N.C. House earlier this month -- but only after the bill was amended to exempt bars and other places that are not open to people younger than 18.

The bill is now before the N.C. Senate.

The Senate Health Committee will take up a substitute bill that will eliminate the exemption and restore the ban to its more restrictive form, according to the chairman of the health committee, Sen. William Purcell.

The health committee had planned to consider the bill yesterday, but the topic was postponed at the last minute because of a concern from the Wilmington film industry that the bill would not allow actors to smoke while being filmed for a movie.

"I don't really like promoting smoking in movies, but on the other hand, the movie industry is very important to the state," said Purcell, D-Scotland.

Legislators will rewrite the bill to deal with the issue of smoking on screen, and then the health committee will hold a hearing on the bill next week, Purcell said.

The holdup demonstrates how far-reaching the proposed smoking ban is -- and how it has rattled many interest groups and employers. The bill, which is sponsored by Rep. Hugh Holliman, D-Davidson, would outlaw smoking in nearly all buildings where people are employed or the public is invited.

The exemption for adult-only businesses is particularly controversial because restaurant owners worry that it would create an uneven playing field. If the exemption stands, family restaurants that also have bars would be forced to ban smoking throughout their buildings, while adult-only bars could continue to allow smoking.

Democratic leaders in both the House and the Senate prefer a smoking ban without the adult-only exemption.

But the exemption makes the bill more palatable for some moderate Democrats, especially ones from tobacco-producing districts.

Most Republicans oppose the bill.

If the Senate approves the more-restrictive version of the bill, without the adult-only exemption, it will return to the House. Holliman said yesterday that he believes that if that happened, the more-restrictive version could get enough votes to pass in the House.

Supporters argue that all businesses should be subject to the ban in order to protect all employees from the health hazards of second-hand smoke.

■ James Romoser can be reached at 919-210-6794 or at jromoser@wsjournal.com.

Loading Comments...
Loading
Print This Print AddThis Social Bookmark Button
 

ADVERTISEMENT

id="companion_ad"

Advertisement

Oops! Your email could not be sent because of the following errors: